What offers FreeJsObfuscator.com ?

What offers FreeJsObfuscator.com ?

The website FreeJSObfuscator.com offers a 100% free online JavaScript obfuscator tool. This tool transforms JavaScript code into an unreadable and complex format while preserving its original functionality.


The primary purposes of this service are to:

○ Protect intellectual property.

○ Prevent reverse engineering and tampering.

○ Enhance code security.

○ Discourage unauthorized use of the code.

It achieves these goals through techniques such as variable and function renaming, string literal extraction and encryption, control flow flattening, dead code injection, and other code transformations. 


Which obfuscation options available on FreeJsObfuscator.com ?

Secure your JavaScript with the FreeJSObfuscator's diverse set of features, designed to make your code unreadable while maintaining functionality.

You can streamline your code in General Settings by removing whitespace and adding unique prefixes to variables, functions, and array names, making them harder to decipher.
 
For String and Number manipulation, the tool offers powerful transformations, letting you convert strings to hex or Unicode, split long strings, or even turn numbers into various bases or symbols for maximum obscurity.

Need to protect intellectual property but keep some elements identifiable? The Keep Names option is your solution, allowing you to easily exempt specific functions, global variables, classes, and their members from obfuscation. 
 
Finally, for an extra layer of protection and control, you can choose to encapsulate your entire output within an auto-executing function or one you name yourself.
 

Polymorphic JavaScript Obfuscator by FreeJsObfuscator.com

A JavaScript obfuscator with polymorphic output is a tool that transforms JavaScript code into a version that is difficult to understand while ensuring that each obfuscation produces a different result, even for the same input — a technique called polymorphism.
 

What is Polymorphic Obfuscation?
Polymorphic obfuscation means:
‣ The same input code yields different obfuscated outputs on each run.
‣ This increases resistance to reverse engineering, pattern matching, and signature-based detection systems.


Features of a Good Polymorphic JavaScript Obfuscator:
Variable/Function Renaming: Randomized on each run (a1, b2, x3, etc.).
String Encoding: Different encoding schemes per execution (Base64, Hex, Unicode escapes).
Control Flow Flattening: Code structure changes on each run.
Dead Code Insertion: Adds dummy code that changes across runs.
Literal Obfuscation: Numbers and strings are hidden using randomized logic.
Code Splitting or Packing: Different packing techniques (e.g., self-executing functions, eval layers).

 
Notes about FreeJsObfuscator
FreeJsObfuscator.com supports Polymorphic obfuscation!
FreeJsObfuscator = Polymorphic JavaScript Obfuscator.
‣ Enter now and check it out yourself - 100% FREE ONLINE OBFUSCATOR

Key Characteristics of FreeJsObfusctor Javascript Obfuscator

Key Characteristics of FreeJSObfuscator Obfuscator


FreeJSObfuscator is a powerful, production-grade JavaScript obfuscator designed to protect your source code from reverse engineering and tampering. Below are its core features and design principles that distinguish it from simpler or outdated obfuscation methods:
 

freejsobfuscator.com is 100% not relied on eval function!

freejsobfuscator.com is 100% not relied on eval function!

freejsobfuscator.com allows you to obfuscate JavaScript code for free, without using the eval() function during the obfuscation process or in the final obfuscated code. 

 

Not Relied on eval() Function

  • eval() is a built-in JavaScript function that executes code represented as a string.

  • Some obfuscators use eval() to decode or run parts of the obfuscated code, but freejsobfuscator.com is not using eval function!

  • However, eval() has serious security risks and can:

    • Open the door to code injection attacks

    • Be blocked or flagged by browsers or security software

    • Make debugging and analysis even harder

    • May change your code and cause bugs! 

So, if an obfuscator does not rely on eval(), that means:

  • The obfuscated code runs without using eval()

  • It’s safer and often better for compatibility and performance

  • It’s more acceptable in secure or audited environments


Visit our our online free JavaScript Obfuscator:

 

 

What are best practices for using javascirpt obfuscator?

What are best practices for using JavaScript obfuscator?

Using a JavaScript obfuscator can help protect your code from reverse engineering and tampering, but it also introduces complexity and potential performance issues. 

Here are best practices for using a JavaScript obfuscator effectively and securely: 

Security & Protection

1. Use Obfuscation as Part of Defense-in-Depth

  • Obfuscation should be one layer in a broader security strategy, not the sole method of protection. Combine with code signing, minification, Content Security Policy (CSP), etc.

2. Don’t Obfuscate Everything

  • Avoid obfuscating third-party libraries, large frameworks (e.g., React, Angular), or browser polyfills. This bloats file sizes and may break functionality.

  • Obfuscate only your proprietary logic and business-critical functions.

3. Enable Anti-Tampering & Debugging Protection (if supported)

Use features like:

  • Console output disabling

  • Debugger traps (debugger; statements)

  • Self-defending code that breaks if modified 

Configuration and Optimization

4. Use High Obfuscation Levels Judiciously

Highly obfuscated code may be harder to debug and slower to execute. Evaluate trade-offs:

  • High: For production, sensitive functions

  • Medium/Low: For performance-critical parts

5. Rotate Obfuscation Patterns Periodically

  • Change obfuscator settings or use random seeds regularly to prevent attackers from learning patterns.

6. Enable String Encryption

  • Encrypt sensitive string literals (like API keys or messages), but never store secrets in frontend code, even if obfuscated.

Tooling & Workflow

7. Integrate Obfuscation into Build Pipeline

  • Use obfuscation with same configuration so it’s consistent and reproducible.

  • Example: Use freejsobfuscator.com.

8. Keep Source Maps Secure (or Don’t Generate Them)

  • If you must use source maps, host them separately and restrict access to trusted devs or error tracking tools.

Testing & Monitoring

9. Test Obfuscated Code Thoroughly

  • Always test your obfuscated builds in staging before releasing to production. Some obfuscators may break code logic or browser compatibility.

10. Monitor for Breakage or Performance Regression

Keep an eye on:

  • Loading times

  • JS errors in production

  • Browser console behavior

Compliance and Legal

11. Be Transparent Where Required

  • If your code is subject to open-source licensing (e.g., GPL), obfuscating it without disclosure may violate terms.

     

How do I choose the right Javascript obfuscator?

How do I choose the right JavaScript obfuscator?

Choosing the right JavaScript obfuscator depends on your specific needs, including security level, performance, project size and development workflow.

Here’s a breakdown to help you make an informed choice: 

1. Clarify Your Goals

Before choosing a JS obfuscator, ask yourself:

  • Are you trying to simply hide code or actively protect it from reverse engineering?

  • Are you protecting sensitive business logic, API keys, or licensing mechanisms?

  • Does performance matter (e.g., in a large web app)?

  • Are you using a build system like Webpack or Rollup?


2. Look for Key Features

A good JavaScript obfuscator should support some or all of the following:

  • Identifier renaming (to make variable and function names meaningless)

  • String encoding (to protect strings from being readable in the source)

  • Control flow flattening (makes the logic hard to follow)

  • Dead code injection (adds fake code to confuse reverse engineers)

  • Self-defending code (resists modification and deobfuscation)

  • Anti-debugging or anti-tampering features

  • Support for modern JavaScript (ES6+)

  • Integration with build tools like Webpack, Gulp, or Babel

 

3. Consider the Trade-Offs

  • More advanced obfuscation makes code harder to reverse-engineer, but it also increases file size and might slow down execution.

  • check out all about https://freejsobfuscator.com

  • Be sure the js-obfuscator you choose supports your build and deployment setup.

 

4. Test Thoroughly

Obfuscated code can break in unexpected ways, especially if the tool alters your control flow or string values. Always test your obfuscated build in production-like environments before shipping it.

Be careful with source maps — if left enabled in production, they can expose your original code. 

FreeJSobfuscator.com provides as-well obfuscation map for all variables, functions, classes.


5. My Recommendation

For most developers, start with freejsobfuscator.com. It’s free, well-documented, actively maintained, and provides a solid mix of obfuscation features.

Let me know your opinion and all on your mind.

 

What does obfuscated javascript code look like?

What does obfuscated JavaScript code look like?

Obfuscated JavaScript code looks like a jumbled mess of short, meaningless variable names, encoded strings, and confusing logic — all while still working as intended by the browser. 

 

Example:

Here’s a simple JavaScript function before and after obfuscation:

Original (Readable)

function greet(name) {
    console.log("Hello, " + name + "!");
}
greet("Alice"); 

Obfuscated (Unreadable)

const _D={'\x75\u006a\u0032\x41\u0077\u005f':((RaxEOgf)=>{return {'\x73\x24\x37\u007a':S=>"\u0049\x5a\x32\x70",'\u0069\x7a\x55\x70':Y=>'\x68\x57\x4e\x52'};})(0b1010111101000),'\x31\x48\u0065':{'\x68\x79\x73\x78':L=>'\x6d\x6a\x53\x74','\x4b\u0067\x39\u0067':Y=>0b101101100},'\u0039\x6c\u0062':{'\x66\u0052\x44\u006c':I=>'\x6e\u0046\x54\x4b','\x49\x6e\x55\x43':O=>"\x66\u0024\x35\u0073",'\x76\u0069\x31\u005a':Y=>0o1424,'\x66\x34\x30\x38':c=>0o1260},'\x59\u0068\x65\x65\x66':(Rxr$,RNwMHk$='\u0063\x68\u0061\x72',RZO='\x41\u0074',RDf='\x5b\u0041\u002d\u005a\x5d',RYo=RegExp,RR9H='\u006d\x61\x70',Rijz='\x73\u0070\x6c\x69\x74',RAh=(((!+[]+!-[]))+(((([]**[]))+((!-[]+!-[]))))),RrGu='\u006a\x6f\u0069\u006e',RKY='\u0049\u006e\x74',RwyB='\u0070\u0061\u0072\x73\x65',Rf='\x78\u0062\x75\u004d\x32\x6c'+'\x47\u0043\x30\x49\x38'+'\x45\u006f\x68\x5a'+'\u0059\x7a\x72\x4c\x4f'+'\x6b\x54\x6d\x58'+'\x42\x34\x67'+'\x73\x39\x70\u0063\u0036'+'\u004e\u0064\x55\x48'+'\x37\x35\u0044\x76\x51\u0041'+'\x6e\u006a\x57\x77\x79'+'\x69\u0052\x74\u0031\x46'+'\u004a\x61\x71'+'\x5f\u0050\u0065\x33'+'\x56\x66\x53\u0024\x4b')=>(RIQd=>Rxr$[Rijz](RYo(RDf))[RR9H](RCUPMPT=>Rf[RNwMHk$+RZO](window[RwyB+RKY](RCUPMPT,RAh+(((((!+[]+!+[]))+(((([]-~[]))+((((((((!-[]+!+[]))+((![]+!+[]))))+((!-[]+!+[]))))*((!+[]+!+[]))))))))+((((((((((!-[]+!+[]))*((!-[]+!-[]))))*((!+[]+!-[]))))+((~~[]-~[]))))*((!+[]+!-[]))))))))[RrGu](RKY[RNwMHk$+RZO]((((((+!-~~[]))+((!+[]+!+[]))))+((((((~~[]-~[]))+((!+[]+!-[]))))*((!-[]+!+[]))))))))((((!+[]+!+[]))*((!-[]+!-[])))),'\x62\x72\u0065\x36':{'\u0052\x4d':O=>((Rbu,Rr,RtS,R_4X2,RVR0,RqKI,RWYh5_,Rl,Re)=>{Rl=[()=>0x3a,()=>window,()=>typeof 0b10000110,()=>typeof self,()=>Math,()=>typeof global,()=>String,()=>0o174,()=>false,()=>0o222,()=>typeof undefined,()=>global,()=>typeof 0b11000100,()=>globalThis,()=>typeof Function,()=>typeof window,()=>typeof globalThis,()=>null,()=>self];RqKI=[(Rq5,Rs7)=>Rq5&(!+[]+!-[])?Rl[Rs7?(((((((!-[]+!-[]))*((!-[]+!+[]))))*((!-[]+!-[]))))*((!-[]+!-[]))):(((((!-[]+!+[]))+((((+!-~~[]))+((!-[]+!-[]))))))+((((((!-[]+!+[]))*((!-[]+!+[]))))*((!+[]+!+[])))))]():(Rq5&(((!+[]+!+[]))*((!-[]+!+[])))?Rl[Rs7?(((((!+[]+!-[]))+((((!-[]+!+[]))+(([]-~[]))))))*((((!-[]+!-[]))+(([]**[]))))):([]-~[])]():(Rq5&(((((!-[]+!+[]))*((!+[]+!-[]))))*((!-[]+!+[])))?Rl[Rs7?(((!-[]+!-[]))+((-~[]))):(((((((!-[]+!-[]))+((((((!+[]+!-[]))*((!+[]+!+[]))))+((+[]+!+[]))))))+((!+[]+!+[]))))*((!-[]+!+[])))]():(Rq5&(((((((!-[]+!-[]))*((!+[]+!+[]))))*((!-[]+!+[]))))*((!+[]+!+[])))?Rl[Rs7?(((!-[]+!+[]))+((((!-[]+!+[]))+(([]**[]))))):((([]**[]))+((((((-~/Rq/))+((((!+[]+!-[]))*((!-[]+!-[]))))))*((!+[]+!-[])))))]():(/_/["\u006c\x61\x73\x74\x49\x6e\x64\x65\u0078"])))),(ROo5b,RUr)=>ROo5b===RUr],RWYh5_=(-~[]);while(RWYh5_<(((((((!+[]+!+[]))*((!-[]+!-[]))))*((!+[]+!+[]))))*((!-[]+!+[]))))if(RqKI[(+[]+!+[])](RqKI[(![]+![])](RWYh5_*=(!-[]+!-[]),(+!-~~[])==(-~[])),R_4X2+'\x6a\u0065'+RVR0)&&(Re=RqKI[(/_/["\u006c\x61\u0073\u0074\u0049\x6e\u0064\x65\x78"])](RWYh5_,(+!+~~[])==(!-[]+!-[])))&&(RtS+Rbu+'\u0074'+Rr) in (Re))return(Re);})('\x61','\x68','\u004d','\x6f\x62','\x63\x74','\u0064\x6f',true,(+[]),'\x77\x69'),'\x74\x77\x46\x66':R=>0x236,'\u0043\x63\u0049\u004b':Q=>0o1534},'\x54\x4a\x78\x74':((RAO9)=>{return {'\x6a\x75\x6b\u0059':h=>0b110001010,'\u0052\x49\x59\u0053':U=>"\x63\x65",'\x79\x55\u0035\x6a':P=>()=>{return(Rd$,Rmh,RQXI,Re0)=>{RQXI="";for(Re0=Rd$.length-(+[]+!+[]);Re0>=(""*``);Re0--){RQXI+=Rd$[Re0];}return(RQXI);};},'\x7a\u0059\x49\x46':v=>'\x6f\x43\u0048\x76','\x52\x43\u0075\u005f\x37\x75\x37\x64':p=>"\x21"};})(0xc64),'\x37\x74\x44':{'\u0072\x4e\x72\x4c':y=>"\x43\u0034\x76\x4c",'\x52\x5a\u007a\x38':S=>"\x41\x6c\x69",'\x48\x73\x70\u0046':q=>0x3cb,'\u0074\x6f\x4c\x62':e=>0x1a6,'\x52\u0063\x52\x45':A=>"\x3b",'\x4e\u0053\u007a\x64':a=>()=>{return(Rlt,Ri,Rf$,RkFE6pP)=>{RkFE6pP=([]*[]);Rf$=(+[]+!+[]);while(Rlt>([]*[])||Ri>([]*[])){if((Rlt&(+[]+!+[]))===(+[]+!+[])&&(Ri&(+[]+!+[]))===(+[]+!+[])){RkFE6pP|=Rf$;}Rlt>>=(+[]+!+[]);Ri>>=(+[]+!+[]);Rf$<<=(+[]+!+[]);}return(RkFE6pP);};},'\x65\x53\u0049\x32':s=>0o520,'\x52\x57':T=>`\x3b`,'\x52\u0047':E=>'\x3b'},'\x41\x5a\x58\x59\x6d':{'\x52\u0054':u=>"\x6c\x6c\u006f",'\u0055\x33\x37\x41':B=>"\u006c\u0077\x55\x4f",'\x67\u0068\u0049\u0058':q=>0b1110011110,'\u0044\u0044\x5a\x52':j=>0o1274,'\x52\u0051':M=>"\x2c\u0020",'\x45\x34\x34\x76':y=>'\x43\x43\x42\x35','\u0075\x44\u0054\x42':v=>'\u0049\x6c\x53\u0054'},'\x66\x6a\x66':{'\x75\u0075\x30\u004f':X=>"\u0053\u006f\x61\x5f",'\x70\x5a\u0033\u0057':Q=>0o527,'\x71\x71\x70\x6e':q=>0o1672,'\x79\u005a\u0036\x5a':L=>0o672},'\x74\x62\x69':((RfEaQ=0o16373)=>{return {'\x52\u0064':Q=>"\x48\x65",'\x6f\x48\x4c\x6e':B=>()=>{return(Rcz="\x35\x67\x34\u0063\x79\u0032",RMi=(/BUS/["\x65\x78\x65\u0063"]("\x33\x31\x33\u0038")),RPA4=(0xb5ab!=Object),Ro6jWF=[],RlHl=0o23304,Ruh=0b1111011000011)=>{for(RlHl+=-RlHl;RlHl<Rcz.length;RlHl++)if(Rcz[RlHl]>RMi)if((Rcz[RlHl]*RPA4)%((+!-~~[])+(+!-~~[]))===(![]^[]))for(Ruh=(![]^[]);Ruh<(Rcz[RlHl]*RPA4);Ruh++)if(Ruh%((+!-~~[])+(+!-~~[])+(+!-~~[]))===(![]^[]))Ro6jWF.push(Rcz[RlHl]*RPA4+Ruh);return(Ro6jWF);};},'\x46\x39\x64\x73':d=>'\u006d\u0079\u0036\x6a','\u0050\x71\u006b\x41':m=>0b1100011011};})()}; function _METL3gJ_(_EVLA){(_D['\x62\x72\x65\x36']['\u0052\x4d']())[_D['\x59\u0068\x65\x65\x66']('\x75\u0056'+'\u0063\u0057\x31'+'\x36\x51'+'\x72\u0053\x63\x55'+'\x35\x42'+'\x31\x6c')][_D['\x59\u0068\x65\x65\x66']('\x35\x5a\x63\x49'+'\x71')]((_D['tbi']['\x52\u0064']()+_D['AZXYm']['\x52\u0054']()+_D['AZXYm']['\x52\u0051']())+ _EVLA+ _D['TJxt']['\x52\x43\u0075\u005f\x37\x75\x37\x64']());}_METL3gJ_((_D['7tD']['\x52\x5a\u007a\x38']()+_D['TJxt']['\u0052\x49\x59\u0053']()));

 

Note:

• The code still works the same.

• It's not encrypted — just scrambled.

• A determined person could reverse it, but it takes time and effort.

 

 

Visit now 100% free JavaScript obfuscator amazing tool...! 

What does it mean if a code is obfuscated?

What does it mean if a code is obfuscated?

If a code is obfuscated, it means the code has been intentionally altered to make it difficult for humans to read or understand, while still functioning the same when executed.

 

In simple terms: 

Obfuscated code = Working code + Hard to read

 

Example:

Original Code (Readable)

function greet(name) {
    console.log("Hello, " + name + "!");
}
greet("Alice");


Obfuscated Code (Hard to Understand)

/*! freejsobfuscator.com v3.26 */const _T={'\x71\u004f\x34\x32\u0066':((EYMR=0x1714)=>{return {'\x45\x66\x33\x62':U=>"\x48\x65\u006c\x6c",'\x48\x4e\x79\x64':C=>0x338,'\x45\x69\u0051\u0064':I=>"\x6f\u002c\u0020",'\x63\x50\x4d\u004d':Q=>0b1000111001,'\x45\x45\u0037\x32':K=>"\x41\u006c",'\x53\u007a\x68\u0043':H=>'\x6b\x76\x69\u004f'};})(),'\x30\x57\u0055\x68\x6c\x24':((EGk=0b10000000000001)=>{return {'\x75\x71\u006c\x6b':N=>"\x51\x5f\x56\x68",'\x48\x44\x46\x7a':z=>0x38e,'\u0046\x6a\u006e\u0066':n=>0o1241,'\u0056\u0052\x49\u0068':M=>()=>{return(EXfj,Ee_e,EoF,Eu)=>{Eu=[];EoF=(EXfj)=>{for(Ee_e of EXfj){Array.isArray(Ee_e)?EoF(Ee_e):Eu.push(Ee_e);}};EoF(EXfj);return(Eu);};},'\x45\u0063':I=>'\x3b'};})(),'\u0054\x67\x66\u0056':((ENZr4,EH=0o323)=>{EH^=ENZr4;return {'\u004d\u0045\x36\x61':R=>"\u004a\x62\x79\u0056",'\u004c\x36\x53\x72':e=>()=>{return(Enm,Ef,Eyu,EZ4F=[],EGA=(+!7506),ED4)=>{if(Enm>=Ef)return((/RAG/["\u0065\x78\u0065\u0063"]("\u0034\x31\x36\x32")));for(;EGA<Eyu;EGA++){ED4=Math.floor(Math.random()*(Ef-Enm+(+[]+!+[])))+Enm;EZ4F.push(ED4);}return(EZ4F);};}};})(0x7ac),'\u0061\x53\x42':((ETpv3qKW)=>{return {'\u004f\x52\u0057\x76':x=>0b100101100,'\x45\u005a\u0033':e=>"\x21",'\x45\x6d':u=>"\u0065",'\u0076\x30\x75\x65':c=>0x323,'\x5f\x79\x75\x58':K=>0o1376,'\x6f\x61\u006a\x76':s=>'\x50\x6b\x4e\u0073'};})(0b10010100110001),'\x31\x67\x24\u0073':{'\x72\x74\x69\x47':U=>0o1110,'\u006d\u0041\x6b\u0072':u=>()=>{return(E_R,EC,ElC,EK3I="\u0076\x67\x71\x34\u0077\u0031\x6d\x65",EY8L=0b101010001110,EZs=(/yet/["\x65\x78\x65\u0063"]("\x35\x39\u0033\u0039")))=>{EZs=new Date();E_R=EZs.getTime();EC=E_R%100,ElC=(E_R+50)%100;EK3I=EC+ElC*(EZs.getSeconds()*EZs.getMinutes()>0o13214?(+!-~~[]):-(+!-~~[]));return(EK3I.toPrecision(EY8L));};},'\x45\u0057\u006a\u0046':p=>"\u003b"},'\u0044\x35\x6b\x5f\x32\x56':((EgR0)=>{return {'\x24\x59\u0038\u0050':z=>'\x47\x7a\u0043\u0030','\u0045\u0066\u0058':v=>`\x3b`,'\u0063\x4c\u0073\x69':S=>'\u0065\x33\u0067\u0066','\x52\x32\x67\x69':v=>"\x4f\u0079\u004e\x6f",'\u0058\x5f\u0048\x66':k=>0b1010101110};})(0o17022),'\x6b\u0076\x64':{'\x45\x61\x67\x70':F=>((EvCj,EBeKk1p,EO5g,Ewqr,Ey,EtaS,EUf3L,EX,E_Vi)=>{EX=[()=>typeof globalThis,()=>typeof 0x4a,()=>String,()=>Infinity,()=>typeof self,()=>self,()=>typeof 0o240,()=>typeof (((((((!-[]+!-[]))*((!+[]+!+[]))))*((!-[]+!-[]))))*((!+[]+!+[]))),()=>0b10111110,()=>true,()=>typeof Date,()=>0o71,()=>typeof window,()=>typeof global,()=>false,()=>0b1011010,()=>window,()=>NaN,()=>globalThis,()=>global];EtaS=[(EJk2EXC,E_$)=>EJk2EXC&(!-[]+!-[])?EX[E_$?(+[]):(((((((~~[]-~[]))+((!+[]+!-[]))))+((((((!+[]+!-[]))+(([]-~[]))))*((!+[]+!+[]))))))*((!+[]+!+[])))]():(EJk2EXC&(((!+[]+!+[]))*((!+[]+!-[])))?EX[E_$?(((((((!-[]+!-[]))+((+!+~~[]))))*((!+[]+!-[]))))*((!-[]+!+[]))):(((((((!+[]+!-[]))*((!-[]+!+[]))))*((!+[]+!+[]))))*((!+[]+!+[])))]():(EJk2EXC&(((((!+[]+!-[]))*((!+[]+!+[]))))*((!+[]+!-[])))?EX[E_$?(((!+[]+!-[]))*((!-[]+!-[]))):(((!+[]+!-[]))+((((!+[]+!+[]))+((~~[]-~[])))))]():(EJk2EXC&(((((((!-[]+!-[]))*((!-[]+!+[]))))*((!-[]+!-[]))))*((!+[]+!+[])))?EX[E_$?((((((([]-~[]))+((((!+[]+!-[]))*((!-[]+!-[]))))))*((!+[]+!-[]))))+((((!+[]+!-[]))+((-~[]))))):(((((((!+[]+!+[]))+((![]+!+[]))))*((!-[]+!+[]))))+((((((!-[]+!+[]))+((((((((!-[]+!+[]))*((!+[]+!+[]))))+((+[]+!+[]))))+((((!-[]+!+[]))*((!-[]+!+[]))))))))+((!+[]+!+[])))))]():([]*[])))),(EiPN,EXOg)=>EiPN===EXOg],EUf3L=(-~/EnsD/);while(EUf3L<(((((((!+[]+!+[]))*((!+[]+!-[]))))*((!+[]+!+[]))))*((!+[]+!+[]))))if(EtaS[(+[]+!+[])](EtaS[(""*``)](EUf3L*=(!-[]+!+[]),(~~[]-~[])==([]**[])),Ewqr+'\u006a\x65'+Ey)&&(E_Vi=EtaS[([]-~~[])](EUf3L,(-~[])==(!-[]+!+[])))&&(EO5g+EvCj+'\x74'+EBeKk1p) in (E_Vi))return(E_Vi);})('\x61','\x68','\u004d','\u006f\x62','\u0063\x74','\x64\x6f',true,(+[]),'\u0077\u0069'),'\x6c\x66\x4c\x45':A=>0x30f,'\x70\u0059\x51\u0046':M=>"\x64\u004c\x6d\x55"},'\x76\x5a\x69\x36\u004a':(Ele,EzJN=(((((!-[]+!+[]))+((-~[]))))*((!-[]+!+[]))),EB='\x49\x6e\x74',Es='\x70\x61\u0072\x73\x65',Ed9$='\x63\u0068\x61\x72',EqY='\x34\x43\x38'+'\x52\u0074\x47\x77\x68\u0059'+'\x37\x71\u0066'+'\x41\x54\u0039'+'\x5a\x4e\x4c'+'\u0067\u006a\x69'+'\u0036\x75\x24\x56'+'\u004f\x44\u006d'+'\u006e\x48\x42\u0051\u0046\u0078'+'\x6f\x32\x63\x4a\x58'+'\x49\u005f\u0065\x30\x55'+'\x70\x6b\u0053\x61\u0035'+'\x64\x33\u0073\x4b\x79'+'\x62\u006c\u0050\x76\x4d\u0072'+'\u0057\u007a\x45'+'\u0031',ETL6Eu='\x6a\x6f\x69\x6e',ELWc='\x6d\u0061\x70',EVG='\x41\x74',ELNl='\u0073\x70\x6c\u0069\x74',Et=RegExp,EVSnICd9='\u005b\x41\x2d\x5a\x5d')=>(EVQ=>Ele[ELNl](Et(EVSnICd9))[ELWc](EBnB=>EqY[Ed9$+EVG](window[Es+EB](EBnB,EzJN+(((((((((!+[]+!-[]))*((!+[]+!-[]))))+((-~[]))))*((((!-[]+!+[]))+(([]-~[]))))))*((!+[]+!+[]))))))[ETL6Eu](EB[Ed9$+EVG]((((((((!-[]+!-[]))+((-~[]))))*((!-[]+!-[]))))*((!-[]+!+[]))))))((+!-~~[])),'\u0062\u0051\x42\x70\x7a\u004f':((EJv)=>{return {'\x45\u0069':u=>"\u0069\u0063",'\x42\x76\u0047\x4b':a=>'\x51\x6d\u0053\x5f','\x63\x71\x6c\x79':k=>0o1713,'\u0041\x48\x62\x56':O=>"\u0078\u0033\x6f\u0048",'\x76\u0038\x47\x24':j=>0b100000100};})(0x1405),'\x4e\x75\u0057\x38':((EJ0=0b1100100001010)=>{return {'\u0069\x39\x65\x41':L=>'\x7a\x6a\x6f\x48','\x6a\x33\x51\u0039':x=>0x2df,'\x56\x73\u0068\x4c':p=>0x2f4};})()}; function _Uwbj(__F4){(_T['\x6b\u0076\x64']['\x45\x61\x67\x70']())[_T['\x76\x5a\x69\x36\u004a']('\x31\x30\x45\u0079'+'\x41\u0073\u004a'+'\x31\u0066'+'\x47\x79\x54\u0031'+'\x6a\x42'+'\x31\x35')][_T['\x76\x5a\x69\x36\u004a']('\x31\x6a\u0050'+'\u0079\x43\x69')]((_T['qO42f']['\x45\x66\x33\x62']()+_T['qO42f']['\x45\x69\u0051\u0064']())+ __F4+ _T['aSB']['\x45\u005a\u0033']());}_Uwbj((_T['qO42f']['\x45\x45\u0037\x32']()+_T['bQBpzO']['\x45\u0069']()+_T['aSB']['\x45\x6d']()));
 

This obfuscated version works the same but is harder to understand, especially if:

• Variable+Function+Class are scrambled.

• Strings are encoded.

• The logic is reordered.

 

Why Code Is Obfuscated:

• To protect intellectual property (e.g., from copying or theft).

• To reduce readability for security through obscurity (though this alone is not real security).
 
 

Is JavaScript obfuscator reversible?

Is JavaScript obfuscator reversible?

JavaScript obfuscation is designed to make code difficult to read and understand, but it's generally not completely irreversible.

Here's a breakdown of why and what "reversibility" means in this context:

What is Obfuscation? 

Obfuscation involves transforming readable JavaScript code into a version that is very hard for humans to comprehend while maintaining its original functionality. Common techniques include: 

  • Renaming variables and functions: Replacing meaningful names with short, random, or single-character names (e.g., calculateTotal becomes a).
  • String encoding: Encoding strings in hexadecimal, Base64, or other formats.
  • Removing whitespace and comments: Minifying the code.
  • Control flow flattening: Restructuring the code's logical flow, making it less linear and harder to follow.
  • Dead code insertion: Adding irrelevant code that doesn't affect execution but adds complexity.
  • Code splitting and dynamic loading: Breaking code into smaller pieces and loading them at runtime.

Why is it not truly irreversible? 

The key is that for the JavaScript code to run in a browser or Node.js environment, it must ultimately be executable by the JavaScript engine. This means the underlying logic and functionality are still present, even if hidden.
  • Execution maintains functionality: While the code looks like gibberish, it still performs the same actions as the original. This allows for dynamic analysis (running the code in a debugger and observing its behavior) to understand its purpose.
  • Some techniques are simply encoding: Simple encoding like Base64 or hexadecimal can be easily reversed with standard decoding tools.
  • Tools and techniques exist for deobfuscation: There are various methods and tools, both automated and manual, that security researchers and reverse engineers use to deobfuscate JavaScript:
  • Beautifiers: Tools can reformat minified code, making it more readable.
  • Manual analysis: Experienced analysts can go through the code line by line, identifying patterns, decoding strings, and reconstructing logic.
  • Debugging tools: Browser developer tools allow stepping through obfuscated code, inspecting variables, and understanding execution flow.
  • Automated deobfuscators: Some tools are designed to reverse common obfuscation techniques.
  • Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) analysis: Advanced deobfuscators can analyze and transform the AST of the code to reveal its underlying structure.

What does "not reversible" often imply?

While not truly irreversible in a technical sense, obfuscation aims to make the cost (time, effort, resources) of reversing the code prohibitively high. It's a "cat and mouse" game:
  • Loss of meaningful names: Once variable names are replaced with meaningless ones, it's virtually impossible to know what the original names were. You can understand what the variable does, but not its original, descriptive name.
  • Complexity: Highly sophisticated obfuscation, especially when combining multiple techniques, can make the code so complex and convoluted that manually unraveling it becomes extremely time-consuming and difficult.
  • Economic barrier: The goal is often to make the effort required to reverse engineer the code exceed the value of the intellectual property or the time it would take to simply redevelop the functionality from scratch.

In summary:

JS obfuscation makes the code difficult to reverse engineer and understand, but it doesn't make it impossible to determine its functionality. The level of "reversibility" depends on the sophistication of the obfuscation applied. Simple obfuscation can be easily reversed, while advanced techniques can significantly increase the time and effort required for deobfuscation.
 

 

Visit freejsobfuscator.com now and watch it in action

------------------- 

100% free javascript obfuscator online